.

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Personality Analysis on ‘The Breakfast Club’ Essay

Released in 1985 and directed by arse Hughes The Breakfast confederacy is a assume close to teens that resonatem different on the surface but come to display otherwise . When five students from different advanced cultivate cliques are forced to lead their Saturday in detention, the brain, athlete, basket case, princess and the criminal together are faced with the question of who they hold they are. The five offices put aside the ir dissimilarities in aid to survive the pestiferous eight hour detention and in the process they disc over they arent as unalike after all.The Breakfast Club is a n all clock time classic pack that portrays a shape of individual and complex psychealities. It is visible in the claim that each teenager has their make traits and pillowcaseistics due to various circumstances such(prenominal) as environmental and agnate influences .The office focus will be privy carousal, the so-called the criminal of the five teenager s . Upon first gla nce, bender seems to be the ave cultus high school poisonous boy acquire his position in this special(prenominal) detention for pulling a false fire alarm . This gives viewers th e idea that his character does whatever he can for attention. booze-up to a fault has a tendency to sound out and do things that will get a controvert reaction out of a person, by insul ting and antagoni sing two character at some stay in the get hold of . By applying Maslows hierarchy of call for and B. F. mule drivers theory of temperament you ge t a more intellectual mental apprehensiveness of curvatures temper.Abraham Maslow real his power structure of call for theory in 1954 to help himself and other humanistic theorists to collapse understand what motivates people. Maslow believed that people are cause to replete specific needs, in utter this he created a five layer pyramid that depicts the order of importance of these specific needs. Maslow has suggested that o nce one need or category is satisfied and saveled by person they can then last on to fulfilling the next need . (McLeod 2007) witness 1 (Maslows Hierarchy of Needs diagram- 1954)Thus according to Maslow if a person does not fulfil their basic physiological needs they lose motivation to settle with belonging and esteem needs. When this occurs the person feels a disinterest to socialise and make friends, typically leading in said person to become disrespectful and inconsiderate of the feelings of others and their opinion. (NetMBA 2010) carouse is clearly portrayed throughout the film as a person who has failed to forwardsgather the first both basic needs of the hierarchy table refer to render 1 . In the film, when lunch dissolve is commenced it is give tongue toed that curvature has come with no nourishment for lunch, whilst the other characters consume all got hearty packed lunches. This could be classified as a sign that shows that bends physiological needs are not being fulfilled . When bender pulls out a pocket knife during a het up(p) discussion you get the idea that Bender clearly doesnt feel reliable and that he needs a weapon system as form of protection, showing that Bender is clearly lacking(p) a thought of security and safety .Further winding of the idea that Bender does not have substantive or rewarding position life takes short letter when Bender shows the root word a scar on his fore arm, given to him by engender as mere punishment for accidentally spilling headstone in the garage.That being said, it is seen throughout the film that Bender is failing to adequately satisfy his physiological and safety needs, leaving him open-handed in fulfilling social needs and lacking in self-esteem and respect. Benders lack of motivation in socialize and qualification friends is the most dominant chance of his bad boy genius, he al bureaus abuses the other characters in the film about things that genuinely upset them -evidently pushing them a way. Bender also suffers from low self-esteem which is wherefore he compensates by putting on a tough, bad boy front. You see this through the way in which he dresses, disobeys the Principals orders, constantly challenge s other male character and also in the way that disrespects the school and its property.In demeanoral theorist B. F. Skinners purview an individuals personality development is heavily influenced by their environment and prior experiences (Sincero 2012) , he wrote that A person does not act upon theworld, the wee-wee acts upon him (Skinner 1971) . Skinner proposed that the development of an individuals personality is generally dependant on the way in which significant adults in their lives would reward or punish then throughout the course of their childhood. (Carter Grivas 2005, p. 407-408) Therefore, children and adolescents raised by offensive and vulturous parents are more inclined to also be come aggressive and unpeaceful towards peers. (Hellesvig-Gaskel l n.d)Throughout The Breakfast Club (Hughes 1985) in that respect are multiple icons that express the negative home life in which Bender is being raised and how it is influencing his personality.In a specific scene Bender imitates a previous heated discussion between him and his catch and according to Bender his father called him stupid, worthless, no good, goddamn, broadloading son of a bitch. Retarded, super mouth, know-it-all, asshole, jerk then Bender pantomimes getting punched in the face by his father as a solving of Bender retaliating. In a behaviouristics perspective this would confirmBenders aggressive personality and tendency to lash-out and insult the other characters.When canvass Bender to Brian pratson the character portrayed as the brain or the nerd of the group, it is visible that as result of polar face-to-face home environments that Brian and Bender have e qually opposite personalities. Brians family are shown as very over supportive and pushy in his scho ol work, yet still compassionate. T his is salutary symbolised again in the lunch scene of the film when Brian unpacks his nutritious, home-made lunch , whilst Bender has been direct to school with nothing to eat.Brians personality comes off as very cautious and anxious, and not once throughout the film does Brian retaliate towards Bender when he acts in a hostile or reprehensible manner- although if the roles were reversed and Brian was acting in a similar fashion toward Bender he w ould lash-out violently or show signs of aggression in return , only when as father would to him. By comparing Brians personality with Bender s you come to understand the impact an abusivehome environment and negative parental influences has on Benders personality.Al t hough both Maslows and Skinners theories o f personality assist in better understanding Benders character the two theorists have are entirely opposite perspectives on personality and how it is developed. Behaviourists believe that pe rsonality is determined by environment and the way an individual reacts to different stimuli (Sternburg 1995, p.589), whilst Humanistic theories conjure that personality is a conscious and free choice for the individual to control. (Coon 1998, p.543) Behaviourist s also state that personality is cause by all kinds of drives, whilst Humanists think that personality is motivated by the want to fulfil self-actualisation.In conclusion, the application of Maslows humanistic perspective and Skinners behaviour ist viewshelp to understand Benders personality efficiently. Discarding the point that both theorists all contradict one another they both give a deeper explanation into wherefore Bender chooses to be insulting and wherefore he lacks interest in making friends, along with justifying Benders rage and aggression struggles. Overall humanist and behaviourist theories on personality assist in the process of understanding and evaluating the personality that makes John Bender of The Br eakfast Club. (Hughes 1985)Bibliography-Coon, D 1998, intromission to Psychology Exploration and Application , suffer/Cole Publishing Company , California, joined States of America.Grivas, J, Carter, L 2005, Psychology VCE Units 1 & 2 , John Wiley & Sons Australia , Queensland, Australia.Hellesvig- Gaskell, K n.d, Parental bewitch on Personality , Viewed 12 th litigate 2014, http//everydaylife.globalpost.com/parental-influence-personality-5605.htmlMcLeod, S 2007, Maslows Hierarchy of Needs , Viewed 12 th shew 2014, http//www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.htmln.a, 2010, Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, Viewed 12 th March 2014, http//www.netmba.com/mgmt/ob/motivation/maslow/Sincero, S 2012, Behaviourists Theories of Personality, Viewed on 12 th March 2014, http//explorable.com/behaviourist-theories-of-personalitySkinner, B 1971, Beyond Freedom and self-regard , Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis, Indian, join States of America.Sternberg, R 1995, In Search of the Human Mind , Earl McPeek , Orlando, United States of America.Van Lersel, H, Bradley, K, Clarke, V, Coon, Koerner, J, Montalto, S, Rossborough, A, Spackman-Williams, M, Stone, A 2005, Nelson Psychology VCE Units 1 and 2 , Nelson, Southbank, Victoria.

No comments:

Post a Comment